"The Leftover Women"... Why Doesn't Progress Change Society's View of Women?

An Article by Moroccan Journalist Hanane Hart

A few days ago, I received a message via WhatsApp from a friend who knows my interest in women's issues—news about a young Chinese woman who appeared in a video crying inside what is known as China's "weekly marriage market." The footage shows a 38-year-old woman who affirms that she has a stable job and a high income of nearly one million yuan per year, yet she says that this is no longer enough to find a life partner, simply because she has passed the age of thirty.

I did not stop at this story as a mere passing individual case; rather, it seemed to me as an entry point to a question about the relationship between economic progress and the persistence of stereotypes that reduce a woman's value to marriage.

In China, which has become the world's second-largest economy in recent decades and has achieved an industrial and technological boom, social pressures on unmarried women remain strong. This is even reflected in the language of society itself, through the term "Sheng Nu" or "leftover women"—an expression carrying negative connotations that reflects the continued perception that a woman's social value is completed through marriage at a certain age.

The irony here is that the woman in the video is not a case of poverty or social marginalization, but a professionally successful and economically independent woman. Yet this success has not shielded her from a social standard that still prioritizes marital status as a measure of "sufficiency" or "completeness."

This irony is not unique to China. In Morocco, as in many Middle Eastern and North African countries, women have made significant gains in education, the labor market, and participation in public life in recent decades. However, these transformations have not fully ended the persistence of traditional social views that make marriage and motherhood central to evaluating a woman's status.

How many professionally or academically successful women still face the same question—"When will you get married?" How many women over thirty find themselves facing veiled comments or social glances carrying ready-made judgments, as if their professional path or personal choices alone are not enough to grant them full social recognition?

In this context, societies in our region today appear to be in a state of tension between rapid material modernity and cultural conservatism that does not change at the same pace. Women have become more present in universities, the labor market, and decision-making institutions, but the social imagination has not kept pace with this transformation, continuing to reproduce stereotypes linking femininity to marriage as a mandatory milestone in a woman's life.

From here emerges a deeper question: Is economic development alone sufficient to change cultural structures?

Reality indicates that the answer is complex. Development brings about a transformation in material indicators, but it does not automatically reshape deeply rooted social perceptions, especially those related to gender and gendered roles.

From China to Morocco, and from East Asia to the Middle East and North Africa, the same problem repeats itself, albeit in different contexts: Why are men's achievements viewed as self-sufficient accomplishments, while women are always required to add a parallel "social achievement" in the form of marriage? Why does a woman's marital status remain a public subject of evaluation and accountability, rather than being a personal choice?

The scene of the Chinese woman crying in the "marriage market" was not merely an emotional moment; it was an entry point to understanding the nature of the contradiction between economic development on the one hand and the slowness of cultural transformation on the other. This reaffirms that equality is not achieved only through education and work, but also through redefining women's status outside ready-made molds—as full citizens whose lives are not reduced to a single role, and whose choices and dignity are measured by what they choose for themselves, not by what society imposes upon them.